Comparison Between Test Scripting and Explanatory Testing
The methods that are used in testing the functionality or effectiveness of software test scripting and explanatory testing. They are majorly used by software engineers or test managers to see how their software functions. The two of them performs the same function, but one will work better for you depending on your preferences. Here are some of the points that we can use to tell the difference between test scripting and explanatory testing methods.
Let us start with their definitions where test scripting is a complex set of instructions that testers must follow to see if the desired outcome is achieved. Test scripting is a detailed method and it requires an intensive preparation before the actual test is commenced. If you want it to uncover all the software errors it should cover all the bases. Test scripting is tiresome since it requires a lot of work.
On the other hand, what is explanatory testing relies on the experience and intuition of the testers to identify and correct errors by themselves. Besides, these testers are not supplied with the expected outcome in advance. On that note it will be able to identify even the errors that test script writing could not find. Besides that, when comparing their speed, you find that explanatory testing is faster than test scripting in identifying errors. Explanatory testing does not require a lot of work.
Test scripting is considered perfect in matters dealing with the identification and usage of the domain. But for it to achieve it perfectly it will require a lot of documentation and time to analyze the domain. While explanatory testing can only work better when it comes to unscripted test since it does not require the domain but depends on the knowledge of the testers.
Besides, test scripting is not efficient in producing detailed scripts since it is intensive and consumes a lot of time. With this, it will give a more detailed report. But on the other hand, explanatory testing is faster and efficient in the production of unscripted tests but majorly it relies on the testers to document their findings.
Another thing is that test scripting formally verify the results against the set specifications. There is a difference since in explanatory testing the results are based on the tester’s expectations against the domain knowledge. As a result, test scripting is able to cover high-risk areas within a minute which can be overlooked by explanatory testing since it depends on testers.
When you compare the costs you will find that test explanatory is more cost effective in analyzing software than test scripting which is tiresome and requires a lot of money.